Family OK with Glenwood Gardens; many still question CPR call
»Play Video
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) — A stroke has been determined as the cause of an 87-year-old woman's death, and her family maintains they are satisfied with the actions of workers at a retirement community where she lived.
Full statement from the family >>
But, questions are still being raised about the 911 call where an operator couldn't convince a facility worker to provide CPR.
"From the information that's available to us, it seems clear that the employee was put in an untenable ethical position," Dr. Christopher Meyers said on Tuesday. He's director of the California State University, Bakersfield Kegley Ethics Institute.
Lorraine Bayless had collapsed in a Glenwood Gardens dining room on Feb. 26, when employees of the independent living center called 911. As the call starts, the operator is told the stricken woman is lying flat on the floor and she's possibly not breathing. Uncut 911 call >>
"We need to get CPR started," the operator's heard saying.
"We can't do CPR," she is told by a woman who identifies herself as a nurse.
"As a licensed nurse, she had a clear professional duty to provide some aid to somebody in distress," Dr. Meyers said Tuesday, a week after the woman's death. "But, she's been given a clear directive, by force, that's she's not supposed to do that."
It's not clear exactly what the duties are of the Glenwood Gardens employee on the phone, or what her nursing background is.
"Had I been the nurse on the scene, I would have done CPR," long-time nurse Audrey Cochran told Eyewitness News. "I can always get another job."
Cochran specializes in elder health issues.
Asked if nurses are required to help someone, Cochran said they are.
"Ethically, but not legally, if your employer forbids it," she said. Cochran said that happens rarely.
Meyers said more needs to be known about Glenwood Gardens' policies, but he also weighed in on whether companies have an ethical obligation to provide aid.
"It seems surprising that they would have a blanket policy that their employees could not render that kind of assistance," he said.
Asked if companies may feel compelled to take a hands-off policy because of their insurers, Meyers said there's an answer to that: "If some insurance company has a prohibition, then find another company."
Eyewitness News made several unsuccessful requests for clarification of the company policies both to administrators at the Bakersfield facility, and to the parent company, "Brookdale Senior Living."
State Assemblyman Rudy Salas, D-Bakersfield, said he's looking for ways to respond. Salas told Eyewitness News a bill he's already introduced can be amended, it's AB 633, a proposal for veterans' access to health care.
Salas said if it seems that laws needs to be clarified or strengthened so people are not afraid of being sued if they help someone, AB 633 could be a vehicle.
Kern County Sheriff's spokesman Ray Pruitt said Bayless' cause of death is now ruled to be a stroke. Pruitt said that was the determination of her personal physician. The doctor who signed the death certificate also called this a natural death.
The Bayless family issued a full statement that they are satisfied with the response by Glenwood Gardens.
Bayless had been pronounced dead at Mercy Southwest Hospital when she was taken there by the ambulance that responded to the 911 call. Bakersfield Fire Department reports show Bayless had no order not to resuscitate her.
Cochran said incidents like this highlight the need for families to communicate clearly what they want as far as health intervention and end of life.
"People (should) talk within families about what they want done in such circumstances," she said. "Our society does not talk about death."
Meyers hopes scrutiny of this incident will lead to more review of company policies, and he expects that will happen with Glenwood Gardens.
"I'm sure that both that individual institution and the corporate entity that owns them is going to be carefully looking at that blanket policy," the CSUB official said.
__
Here is the statement from the family of 87-year-old Lorraine Bayless, who died last week of a heart attack after being denied CPR at a Bakersfield elder home:
Our mother and grandmother was a remarkable and intelligent woman who was blessed to have a great life of 87 years. It is the wish of our family to honor and celebrate her life at this personal time. Like so many Seniors, it was our mother's wish to live independently. She was fully-aware that Glenwood Gardens did not offer trained medical staff. Even so, she personally-selected the senior living community, and our family has come to know the staff and been very pleased with Glenwood Gardens as her home. It was our beloved mother and grandmother's wish to die naturally and without any kind of life-prolonging intervention. Our family respects the right of all people to make their own life choices in such cases.
We regret that this private and most personal time has been escalated by the media. Caregivers, nurses and other medical professionals have very difficult waters to tread in the legal and medical landscape of our country today. We understand that the 911 tape of this event has caused concern, but our family knows that mom had full knowledge of the limitations of Glenwood Gardens, and is at peace. We also have no desire, nor is it the nature of our family, to seek legal recourse or try to profit from what is a lesson we can all learn from.
We wish to focus on our family at this time, and this will be our final comment on this personal matter.
— The Bayless Family
what about the employees..should they be given emergency care..????....the situation as a whole is just scarey to me!!!..:(
Do you want to know the real reason why the Glenwood Gardens staff do not provide emergency care? All you have to do to understand their policy is read these comments. The people that are writing these comments seem to believe that this family received some sort of monetary recompense for the loss of their mother/grandmother. I haven't seen any evidence of that in any story that has been published. I did see that the family clearly stated that they "have no desire...to profit" from this experience. Why do those leaving comments believe that the family got a fat check? Because that is what they would expect if it had been their family member. Because we live in a world where the average person's first response is to call a lawyer, institutions such as this one have to cover themselves from potential legal actions. This is why Glenwood Gardens employees are instructed to call 911 and wait until EMS arrives. Without a policy like this in place, institutions like Glenwood Gardens would be sued out of business, and MY grandmother (who is a resident there) would not have a place to receive the care that she needs as an acute Alzheimer's patient. So, to those of you who dare to have the audacity to question why this family has come to terms with their grandmother's death because they didn't "raise a stink" or sue like you would have, I hope you understand that their mother/grandmother died because of policies that people like you make necessary.
The only reason I can think that the family would be "OK" with the treatment of their mother was that they stand to get a big inheritance after this woman's death.  Otherwise, no human being would be "OK" with the lack of concern for their mother. Glenwood is not a cheap place, prob cost $4k or more a month.  Â
Horrible - the nurse turns out to be the Director of Patient Services but she's not serving there as a nurse HOWEVER a nurse all the same with training - is shocking beyond belief. On the 911 tape they ask her "is there someone else there that can help the patient" and her response was "not at this time". A major concern is many senior facilities admit patients as young as 55 so would they be left to die also? An appropriate plan needs to be put into place before this happens again. To fight with 911 for 7 minutes on the phone while your patient lies dying on the floor is unacceptable regardless of the cause or age of the patient. If the patients at the facility understand CPR is provided to no one then each patient should have a DNR order in place showing they actually consent to this policy.Â
you are some Heartless People... you should be ashamed of yourselves... the family understands. the daughter of Lorraine is an RN and understands that there is less than  a 5% chance  of surviving CPR) if sh did surviveÂ
she would have been a brain dead and on a feeding tube. How do you think she would have liked that??? she had a wonderful 87 years and many friends at the facility (friends and staff) Â she would not have wanted to spend her remaining years unresponsive hooked up to a feeding tube.. WOULD YOU??? leave her and her family at peace!!! shame on you!!! :/
@cookie02 what the issue is at hand..there are many people there at that facility in there mid fifties....the blanket policy needs revisoin..if it was okay for that woman to end her life as such..FINE..then in her file they can check that box..but a blanket policy is what they have right now...they are saying they have a BLANKET policy, so there are NO boxes to check..and I have great sorrow for the immediate family..they made a choice that should be respected, but, again, that is not the overall issue here..........lighten up..:)
What the heck?? Â This family is OK with the fact that their mother/grandmother was left to die in the middle of a dining room...WOW..that is unimaginable. Â The nurse/administrator that REFUSED to perform CPR or even ask someone else to do so needs to do some major soul searching...oh wait..she doesn't have a soul.
I would say I am sorry for your loss, but you don't seem too broken up. So who said you needed to sue the facility in order to get justice. I would be there raising a big stink if that were *my* mother/grandmother. And if she didn't want her life prolonged, why did she NOT sign a DNR order?  It sounds like you people are just glad to be rid of her.
@SCastro No doubt the big check they got from the facility helped to ease the pain and heartache.