County supervisor: Part of animal control report 'wasn't the smartest'
»Play Video
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) — Kern County's new animal control director is taking aim at the problem of too many sick pets in the shelter. A 14-page report lists reasons why Kern faces an epidemic of parvo in puppies, and that analysis is drawing some fire.
"We have made a lot of progress," Janice Anderson said Wednesday, in response to the report. Anderson is a member of the Kern County Animal Control Commission, a citizen group.
"We've got a long way to go," she said. "But, these problems didn't happen overnight."
The report is titled "Puppy Love Program at Bakersfield Shelter," and dated Dec. 27. An animal control spokeswoman said Wednesday it's a "draft" and couldn't confirm that new director Jen Woodard is the author. Woodard started with the county last October.
But, newly elected Kern County Supervisor Leticia Perez told Eyewitness News she read the report last week, and called Woodard about it. Perez said she was particularly concerned about the first item listed as reasons for the parvo epidemic in the shelter. That section is titled "cultural belief regarding pet care."
"There are many communities in Kern County that are 98 percent Mexican and Spanish-speaking," the report reads. "The culture in Mexico regarding pet care is very different than what is expected in the United States."
It says often there are no limits on the number of pets and no protection from vaccinations.
"I invited the animal control director into my office to discuss that component of it," Perez said. "She recognized that probably wasn't the smartest thing to do in that report."
Animal activist Liz Keogh also takes strong exception to that component, arguing the statistic isn't even accurate. Keogh called the whole report insulting.
"This kind of manifesto doesn't help the animals," she said.
Anderson said some of the material in the report is "old news," listing problems that have been identified for a long time.
According to the report, other factors affecting the number of sick puppies in the shelter include a lack of knowledge about pet disease and prevention, and what it calls a lack of awareness of pet responsibility. It cites the "inability of existing animal welfare organizations (public and private) to unite and spread this message."
"We've got our animal welfare organizations around town, they are uniting and working together," Anderson counters. She also stresses more clinics are being offered.
The lack of low-cost spay/neuter and vaccination clinics is also listed as a problem, and the report points to local veterinarians.
"If the vets could unite and provide services to an entire community, instead of focusing only on certain areas and income brackets, there could be a united message for all residents," it says.
The new No. 2 person at Kern County Animal Control said there is progress on providing pet care services to the public.
"I think the Critters without Litters clinic just opened," Shyanne Schull told Eyewitness News. She said that's a turning point to help provide low-cost options to pet owners.
One more criticism in the report, is that Kern County hasn't made progress like other areas.
"Some of the progressive movements in the L.A. area regarding animal welfare and public/private partnerships," reads the report, "Do not make it 'over the hill' to Bakersfield."
Again, Anderson from the animal commission counters that progress is being made.
The report says other communities also deal with the problem of parvo cases, saying it's a "number one" on everyone's list. It also notes the warm climate in Kern County adds to the problem, it's an easy place for the parvo virus to thrive.
But, the report also says there are simply problems with the shelter itself, calling the facility inadequate, in poor condition, and overcrowded. It lines out a number of solutions including more community education, adding more low-cost vaccination options, and encouraging puppy foster programs.
The report also suggests there should be a new "Puppy Place" designated at the shelter, where the little dogs can be quarantined for a longer period and carefully watched for signs of parvo -- to help reduce the spread of the disease. Then healthy puppies can be adopted out or put in foster care.
"The goal here is not to point fingers or lay blame on anyone," new assistant director Shyanne Schull said about the report. "The important thing is that we're trying to find solutions to the problems."
Anderson says it’s important for the community to get behind the county and city of Bakersfield in their efforts to improve services for animals.
Supervisor Perez said there's an opportunity to change the situation. She said Woodard promised to work with her on special clinics in the Lamont community starting next month.
"I'm very hopeful for the future," Perez said. "She gave me her word that we'd be working together to solve these issues."
as someone with intimate knowledge of the situation, I think the problems at the Kern County "shelter" are vast. Ms. Woodard has changed 3 former high kill shelters into no-kill shelters and that is no easy feat. Her bringing up the issues involving the Hispanic population and how dogs are viewed and treated in Mexico was not ignorant finger pointing, it is based on indisputable facts. People of all races and creeds neglect and abuse animals but at the Bakersfield shelter, where this a line all day long out the door to drop off unwanted dogs. It would be turning a blind eye if it went unmentioned that the vast majority of the people surrendering dogs they claim to have "found" (another problem-a fee for surrendering your own pet.) are Hispanic. Ms. Woodard wasn't suggesting that they be ignored or somehow marginalized, but instead is talking about educating that segment of our population as well as offering spay and neuter clinics and free vaccinations to those who can't afford them. How anyone would be insulted by this is amazing to me. What should insult all of us is that in California we have the THIRD HIGHEST KILL SHELTER IN THE COUNTRY with 800+ animals much of the time. Shame on Supervisor Perez. She is choosing to take the focus away from the critical issues facing the shelter and taking issue with semantics. Perhaps if her last name was "Smith", she would be more concerned with representing ALL of the people in her district rather than attempting to dispute facts that may be politically incorrect to address, but are unfortunately all too true. Ms. Woodard is a blessing to the shelter. Until she came there were no vet techs, let alone a vet, on staff which is appalling.
Again, shame on you Ms. Perez. Let Ms. Woodard do what she is so well respected for doing: saving the lives of animals.
I'm glad that people are overlooking particularly alienating accusations in the interests of the animals. I think that it does show that the community is interested in helping, she just needs to ask for it.
It has more to do with being low income and many people who immigrate from mexico are low income.
Â
The stray animal situation in Lamont,CA is dire. Many people in Lamont immigrated from mexico and as you can guess, are low income.